Participatory multi-criteria assessment of forest planning policies in conflicting situations: The case of Tenerife

18Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sustainable forest planning should involve the participation of stakeholder communities in the decision-making process. This participation can help avoid the possible rejection of new planning measures. In this paper, the decision-making process to implement regulations on the use of forest tracks on the island of Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain) is analyzed. In recent years, the number of people using the island's forest environments has notably increased, leading to conflicts between different users of the tracks; as a result, the Island Council of Tenerife is working on regulating these pathways. This paper describes the framing analysis, design, and implementation of a participatory multi-criteria approach to explore, together with stakeholders, the best policy alternatives related to forest planning and management issues of forest track use. To do this, a set of tools has been developed, consisting of institutional analysis, participatory methods, and multi-criteria assessment techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Acosta, M., & Corral, S. (2015). Participatory multi-criteria assessment of forest planning policies in conflicting situations: The case of Tenerife. Forests, 6(11), 3946–3969. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6113946

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free