Age and gender correlates of pulling in pediatric trichotillomania

70Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Our goals were to examine clinical characteristics and age and gender correlates in pediatric trichotillomania. Method: A total of 62 children (8-17 years of age) were recruited for a pediatric trichotillomania treatment trial and characterized using structured rating scales of symptoms of hairpulling and common comorbid conditions. We analyzed the association between qualitative and quantitative characteristics of pulling, comorbidities, and age and gender. We also examined the type of treatments these children previously received in the community. Results: We found lower rates of comorbid depression and anxiety disorders than have been reported in adult trichotillomania samples. Focused hairpulling significantly increased with age, whereas automatic pulling remained constant. Older children with hairpulling experienced more frequent urges and a decreased ability to refrain from pulling. Female participants reported greater distress and impairment associated with hairpulling, even though the severity of pulling did not differ from that of male participants. Conclusion: These results confirm several findings from the Children and Adolescent Trichotillomania Impact Project (CA-TIP). Our cross-sectional findings suggest there may be a developmental progress of symptoms in trichotillomania. Children appeared to develop more focused pulling, to become more aware of their urges, and to experience more frequent urges to pull, as they get older. Although these are important findings, they need to be confirmed in prospective longitudinal studies. © 2013 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panza, K. E., Pittenger, C., & Bloch, M. H. (2013). Age and gender correlates of pulling in pediatric trichotillomania. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.12.019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free