An association mapping framework to account for potential sex difference in genetic architectures

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Over the past few years, genome-wide association studies have identified many trait-associated loci that have different effects on females and males, which increased attention to the genetic architecture differences between the sexes. The between-sex differences in genetic architectures can cause a variety of phenomena such as differences in the effect sizes at trait-associated loci, differences in the magnitudes of polygenic background effects, and differences in the phenotypic variances. However, current association testing approaches for dealing with sex, such as including sex as a covariate, cannot fully account for these phenomena and can be suboptimal in statistical power. We present a novel association mapping framework, MetaSex, that can comprehensively account for the genetic architecture differences between the sexes. Through simulations and applications to real data, we show that our framework has superior performance than previous approaches in association mapping.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kang, E. Y., Lee, C. H., Furlotte, N. A., Joo, J. W. J., Kostem, E., Zaitlen, N., … Han, B. (2018). An association mapping framework to account for potential sex difference in genetic architectures. Genetics, 209(3), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.117.300501

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free