Trusting Traumatic Memory: Considerations from Memory Science

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Court cases involving sexual assault and police violence rely heavily on victim testimony. We consider what we call the Traumatic Untrustworthiness Argument (TUA) according to which we should be skeptical about victim testimony because people are particularly liable to misremember traumatic events. The TUA is not obviously based in mere distrust of women, people of color, disabled people, poor people, and so forth. Rather, it seeks to justify skepticism on epistemic and empirical grounds. We consider how the TUA might appeal to the psychology and neuroscience of memory for empirical support. However, we argue that neither support the TUA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Springle, A., Dreier, R., & Goldwasser, S. (2023). Trusting Traumatic Memory: Considerations from Memory Science. Philosophy of Science, 90(5), 1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.31

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free