Implementation of good clinical practice in clinical research in the context of limited resources settings: Lessons learnt from the freeBILy trial using an embedded mixed methods approach

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Limited financial and human resources and infrastructure can affect the implementation of Good Clinical Practice (GCP), which can have a detrimental impact on data quality and the robustness and application of clinical trial outcomes. Monitoring frameworks are designed to ensure good data quality and help to guide adaptations of trial procedures over time. However, these frameworks tend to be based on datacentric approaches, which often neglect vital aspects of trials, such as social responsibility, capacity strengthening, and contextual influence. Therefore, this study analyses barriers and facilitators of the implementation of GCP in resource-limited settings to inform the establishment of adapted frameworks for trial management and monitoring.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gunga, L., Rausche, P., Rakotoarivelo, R. A., Rasamoelina, M., Solonirina, J., Fesia, E., … Fusco, D. (2026). Implementation of good clinical practice in clinical research in the context of limited resources settings: Lessons learnt from the freeBILy trial using an embedded mixed methods approach. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013899

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free