Merits and Pitfalls of Currently Used Diagnostic Tools in Mycetoma

95Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Treatment of mycetoma depends on the causative organism and since many organisms, both actinomycetes (actinomycetoma) and fungi (eumycetoma), are capable of producing mycetoma, an accurate diagnosis is crucial. Currently, multiple diagnostic tools are used to determine the extent of infections and to identify the causative agents of mycetoma. These include various imaging, cytological, histopathological, serological, and culture techniques; phenotypic characterisation; and molecular diagnostics. In this review, we summarize these techniques and identify their merits and pitfalls in the identification of the causative agents of mycetoma and the extent of the disease. We also emphasize the fact that there is no ideal diagnostic tool available to identify the causative agents and that future research should focus on the development of new and reliable diagnostic tools. © 2014 van de Sande et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van de Sande, W. W. J., Fahal, A. H., Goodfellow, M., Mahgoub, E. S., Welsh, O., & Zijlstra, E. E. (2014). Merits and Pitfalls of Currently Used Diagnostic Tools in Mycetoma. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002918

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free