Redefining the blanking period by a long-term follow-up after atrial fibrillation ablation using second-generation cryoballoon

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

On the basis of radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), some studies suggested that early recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERATs) were associated with late AF recurrence (LAFR), and some also sus-pected and challenged the current recommended 90 day blanking period. We aim to evaluate the impact of ERAT on long-term success and to determine the optimum blanking period after AF ablation using second-generation cryoballoon (sg-CB). From August 2016 to October 2018, 369 consecutive patients who successfully underwent initial AF ablation using sg-CB at the Fuwai Hospital were finally enrolled. All patients were fol-lowed up no less than 12 months. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimum blanking period after AF ablation. There were 62 (16.8%) who experienced ERAT. After a median follow-up of 615 days, 74.5% were free of LAFR after the 90 day blanking period. Incidence of freedom from LAFR during the long-term follow-up was markedly lower in patients with ERAT than in those without ERAT (27.4% versus 84.0%; log-rank P < 0.001). Furthermore, only ERAT (HR 8.579; 95% CI 5.604-13.133; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with an increased risk of LAFR after adjusting for other factors. The optimum cut-off time point for the blanking period was 21.5 days (sensitivity: 71.1%, specificity: 94.1%). In con-clusion, ERAT was an independent predictor of LAFR after AF ablation using sg-CB. Based on our findings, blanking period was advised to be shorten to 21.5 days or about 3 weeks instead of 90 days after CB ablation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xia, Y., Liu, J., Jia, Y., Zhang, H., Yu, M., Li, X., & Fang, P. (2020). Redefining the blanking period by a long-term follow-up after atrial fibrillation ablation using second-generation cryoballoon. International Heart Journal, 61(5), 936–943. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.20-234

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free