Correction to: A Systematic Review of Familiarisation Methods Used in Human–Robot Interactions for Autistic Participants (International Journal of Social Robotics, (2024), 16, 1, (37-53), 10.1007/s12369-023-01015-y)

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Correction to: International Journal of Social Robotics In the above-mentioned paper, Table 3 was incorrectly published. Please find the correct Table 3 below. (Table presented.) The summary of the included studies in the systematic review Citation Age of participants (years) Diagnosis Robot Categorised familiarisation type [2] 6–7 ASD NAO Capability demonstration [3] 9 ASD via DSM 5 ARC Initial experimental session [4] Child—age not specified No detail NAO Static exploration, stimulus and response [7] 7–11 ASD KiliRo Static exploration [8] 3–6 ASD w/ speech impairment or language delay CHARLIE Static exploration, remote control [10] 5–16 ASD TeoG Static exploration, free play [11] 4–6 ASD via DSM-IV NAO Free play: elements of capability demonstration & stimulus and response [12] Child—age not specified ASD PLEO Free play [16] 17–19 ASD LEGO MindStorms NTX Initial experimental session, capability demonstration [18] 5 ASD NAO & MiRo Capability demonstration [20] 5–11 ASD via ADOS Gipy Capability demonstration [21] 7–12 ASD, no ID Daisy robot Capability demonstration, stimulus and response, element of static exploration [24] 6–7 ASD via DSM-IV Pekoppa Capability demonstration [25] 6–7 ASD via DSM-IV Pekoppa Capability demonstration [26] 7–11 ASD via DSM-V Pekoppa Capability demonstration [27] 2–5 No detail QueBall Capability demonstration, stimulus and response [28] 7–11 ASD MARIA Capability demonstration [29] 8–12 ASD, severe to mild ID KASPAR Capability demonstration, stimulus and response [30] 8–12 ASD via DSM-IV, no ID NAO Capability demonstration [31] Child—age not specified No detail NAO Static exploration, capability demonstration [33] 2–6 PDD-NOS or Autism iRobi Static exploration [34] 4–5 ASD, low to high functioning CuDDler Initial experimental session [35] 7–11 ASD via DSM-IV, low to high functioning KASPAR Static exploration [36] 5 ASD via DSM-V NAO Stimulus and response [37] 5–10 ASD, severe ID White, spherical prototype Static exploration [40] 18–27 ASD via DSM-V, DISCO Actroid-F Remote control [49] 4–5 ASD via DSM-V NAO Initial experimental session [50] 7–9 ASD NAO Stimulus and response [51] 6–9 ASD NAO Stimulus and response [55] 1–5 ASD NAO Capability demonstration [56] 7–9 ASD, low severity Daisy robot Initial experimental session [57] 4–9 ASD via ADOS & DSM-IV Probo Stimulus and response, capability demonstration [59] 7–11 ASD NAO Initial experimental session [62] 5–10 ASD, verbal and non-verbal children Robota Capability demonstration [63] 5 ASD Robota Capability demonstration, initial experimental session [64] 5–10 ASD, verbal and non-verbal children Robota Capability demonstration [65] Child—age not specified ASD Robota Initial experimental session [66] 5–10 ASD, verbal and non-verbal children Robota Capability demonstration [67] Child—age not specified No detail KASPAR Free play [68] 6–8 ASD via CARS, ADOS NAO Capability demonstration, static exploration [69] 5–12 ASD via ICD-10, DSM-IV or DSM-V Zeno/Milo Capability demonstration [71] 5–13 ASD via ADOS, moderate to borderline ID NAO Capability demonstration [72] 5–9 ASD via ADOS/ADI Humanoid robot, box robot Capability demonstration [73] 5–7 ASD, no ID Probo Free play: elements of capability demonstration, stimulus and response & Static exploration [75] 3–5 ASD via CARS RoboParrot & Sphero Stimulus and response [76] 2–6 5 with ASD via DSM-IV, 1 suspected ASD NAO Stimulus and response [77] 59–70 ASD w/ ID Robot seal Paro Static exploration [80] 8–12 ASD, high functioning or Asperger’s syndrome 2 robots A and B, make unknown Static exploration [81] 5–8 ASD via DSM-IV, ADOS/ADI/SRS NAO Stimulus and response [82] 5–8 ASD via DSM-IV & ADOS/ADI NAO Stimulus and response DSM diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders [14], ID intellectual disability, ADOS autism diagnostic observation schedule [46], PDD-NOS pervasive developmental disorder - not otherwise specified, DISCO diagnostic interview for social and communication disorders [43, 79], CARS childhood autism rating scale [70], ICD-10 international classification of diseases (World Health Organisation), ADI autism diagnostic interview [47], SRS social responsiveness scale [13] Springer wishes to apologize for any inconvenience caused.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wallbridge, C. D., McGregor, C., Drozdz, N., von dem Hagen, E., & Jones, C. R. G. (2024, January 1). Correction to: A Systematic Review of Familiarisation Methods Used in Human–Robot Interactions for Autistic Participants (International Journal of Social Robotics, (2024), 16, 1, (37-53), 10.1007/s12369-023-01015-y). International Journal of Social Robotics. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01029-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free