Expertise, politics and public opinion at the crossroads of the European Commission’s decision-making: The case of Glyphosate

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the growing politicisation of European Union (EU) integration, the European Commission is increasingly facing a tension between technocratic and responsive decision-making. How does this tension play out in the process of supranational implementation under comitol-ogy rules? We argue that the tension between the Commission´s role as a technocrat and as a responsive bureaucrat takes place during the implementation process when the issue at stake becomes politicised. We test our argument through the analysis of the Glyphosate renewal procedure (2015-2017). We process-trace the case by means of semi-structured interviews, media and document analysis. We find that with the increase of issue visibility and subsequent politi-cisation, the Commission progressively abandons a purely technocratic behaviour. First, it puts in place political strategies such as delays and blame-shifting to release itself from the burden of unpopular decisions. Secondly, it seeks to respond to concerns expressed by consumers by proposing compromise-based measures closer to public interest. Ultimately, we show how the outcome of the policy process is mediated by politicisation and characterised by a shift from technocratic to responsive decision making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bazzan, G., & Migliorati, M. (2020). Expertise, politics and public opinion at the crossroads of the European Commission’s decision-making: The case of Glyphosate. International Review of Public Policy, 2(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.849

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free