Sehschärfebestimmung mit freiburger visustest, Bailey-Lovie-Tafel und Landoltring-Tafel

55Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: If different ways for correcting refractive errors of the human eye have to be compared, accurate and reproducible measurement procedures are necessary. Methods: Binocular visual acuity of 130 students without pathologies was measured with the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test, the Bailey-Lovie chart and a Landolt ring chart (4 orientations). The reproducibility of the FVT was determined by repeated measurements. Results: The average visual acuity was 1.93 ± 0.03 (= 20/10.4) with the FVT, 1.82 ± 0.03 (= 20/11) with the Landolt ring chart, and 1.48 ± 0.02 (= 20/13.5) with the Bailey-Lovie chart. 50% of all repeated measurements with the FVT were within an interval of ± 0.035 logMAR from the mean value. 95% were within ± 0.1 logMAR. Results of earlier studies are discussed. Conclusion: On average, visual acuity values found with the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test were slightly larger as compared to the Landolt ring chart (difference = 0.025 logMAR). Taking the maximal difference of 0.05 logMAR tolerated by the international standard DIN EN ISO 8597 [8] into account, both tests are equivalent. The results found with the Bailey-Lovie chart were substantially lower as compared to the Landolt ring chart (difference = 0.09 logMAR). The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test has a high reproducibility and measures visual acuity on a continuous scale that is not limited to the traditional visual acuity steps. Thus, it can be recommended as a reference procedure for comparative visual acuity studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wesemann, W. (2002). Sehschärfebestimmung mit freiburger visustest, Bailey-Lovie-Tafel und Landoltring-Tafel. Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde, 219(9), 660–667. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free