Magnetic resonance cholangiography of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: A prospective double-blind study

47Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in quantitatively evaluating biliary strictures in liver transplant recipients. Materials and Methods: Eight liver transplant recipients with suspected biliary complications were referred for ERC and also underwent MRC within 24 hours using a combination of single-shot rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (SS-RARE) and three-dimensional (3D)-RARE sequences. The studies were independently interpreted by two blinded radiologists and a single blinded endoscopist who recorded the presence of a stricture and/or upstream dilatation, the ratio of recipient-to-donor duct diameters at the anastomosis, as well as the proximal duct diameter, length, and percent stenosis of any stricture detected. Results: Using ERC as the standard of reference, MRC had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%, mean specificity of 83.3%. and mean positive predictive value of 92.9% in the detection of six strictures. Compared with ERC, MRC obtained accurate measurements of recipient-to-donor duct diameter ratios (r, 0.91; P < 0.01), proximal duct diameters (r, 0.83. P < 0.05), stricture lengths (r, 0.58; P = 0.06), and percent stenosis (r, 0.78; P = 0.06). Conclusion: MRC can provide equivalent imaging to ERC and can reliably identify and quantitatively evaluate biliary strictures in post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kitazono, M. T., Qayyum, A., Yeh, B. M., Chard, P. S., Ostroff, J. W., & Coakley, F. V. (2007). Magnetic resonance cholangiography of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: A prospective double-blind study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 25(6), 1168–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20927

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free