Website quality evaluation: a model for developing comprehensive assessment instruments based on key quality factors

4Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The field of website quality evaluation attracts the interest of a range of disciplines, each bringing its own particular perspective to bear. This study aims to identify the main characteristics – methods, techniques and tools – of the instruments of evaluation described in this literature, with a specific concern for the factors analysed, and based on these, a multipurpose model is proposed for the development of new comprehensive instruments. Design/methodology/approach: Following a systematic bibliographic review, 305 publications on website quality are examined, the field's leading authors, their disciplines of origin and the sectors to which the websites being assessed belong are identified, and the methods they employ characterised. Findings: Evaluations of website quality tend to be conducted with one of three primary focuses: strategic, functional or experiential. The technique of expert analysis predominates over user studies and most of the instruments examined classify the characteristics to be evaluated – for example, usability and content – into factors that operate at different levels, albeit that there is little agreement on the names used in referring to them. Originality/value: Based on the factors detected in the 50 most cited works, a model is developed that classifies these factors into 13 dimensions and more than 120 general parameters. The resulting model provides a comprehensive evaluation framework and constitutes an initial step towards a shared conceptualization of the discipline of website quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morales-Vargas, A., Pedraza-Jimenez, R., & Codina, L. (2023). Website quality evaluation: a model for developing comprehensive assessment instruments based on key quality factors. Journal of Documentation, 79(7), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2022-0246

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free