Conference Proceedings

A study of automatic pitch tracker doubling/halving “Errors”

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2001 Workshop - 2nd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (2001)
DOI: 10.3115/1118078.1118091
5Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Manually verified pitchdata werecompared with output from acommonly used pitch-tracking algorithm. The manual pitch data made statistically significantly better “final rise” predictions than the automatic pitch data, in spite of great similarity between the two sets of measurements. Pitch Tracking doubling/halving errors are described.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murray, K. (2001). A study of automatic pitch tracker doubling/halving “Errors.” In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2001 Workshop - 2nd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1118078.1118091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free