Financial Flexibility and the Cost of External Finance for U.S. Bank Holding Companies

  • Billett M
  • Garfinkel J
32Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper models a bank with access to two segmented capital markets, the market for insured deposits and the market for uninsured claims. We illustrate how higher costs of accessing either market leads to lower firm values and a greater incentive to carry liquid assets. We test our model on a sample of large banking firms, and label banks with relatively lower costs of accessing the two markets as more "financially flexible." Our two key findings are (1) banks with greater financial flexibility have greater value, and (2) banks with greater financial flexibility devote a smaller percentage of assets to cash and marketable securities, consistent with the notion that financial flexibility reduces the sensitivity of firm profits to internal wealth shocks, thus reducing the firm's need to carry financial slack.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Billett, M. T., & Garfinkel, J. A. (2004). Financial Flexibility and the Cost of External Finance for U.S. Bank Holding Companies. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 827–852. https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2004.0071

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free