Abstract
Background: Evidence suggests that living close to “blue spaces” (water features), particu-larly coastlines, has salutary effects on human health. Methods: We analyzed five years of annual, self-reported general health and unhealthy days data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for 165 urban areas across the con-tiguous U.S. We compared health self-reports for people living in coastal vs. non-coastal urban areas and for residents of the disaster-prone Gulf of Mexico region vs. other locations. Coastal urban areas were defined as those having ≥50% of their population living within 20 km of a coast. Results: We found no overall health advantage of residing in a coastal urban location when all urban areas were considered. However, residents from non-Gulf of Mexico coastal urban areas reported modestly better health than residents from non-coastal areas. In contrast, self-reported health of Gulf coastal urban residents was significantly poorer than that of residents from other urban areas. Conclusions: The frequency of disasters and history of health and socioeconomic disparities in the Gulf region may be responsible, at least in part, for the apparent lack of health promoting effects of coastal location there.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sandifer, P. A., Braud, A. S., Knapp, L. C., & Taylor, J. (2021). Is living in a U.S. coastal city good for one’s health? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168399
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.