Hierarchical and distributional lexical field theory: A critical and empirical development of louw and nida's semantic domain model

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper argues that the underdeveloped notion of semantic similarity in Louw and Nida's lexicon can be improved by taking account of distributional information. Their use of componential analysis relies on a set of metalinguistic terms, or components, that are ultimately arbitrary. Furthermore, both the polysemy within their semantic domains and the organization of those domains problematize their categories. By contrast, distributional data provide an empirical measurement of semantic similarity, and lexicogrammatical categorization provides a non-intuition-driven principle of classification. Distributional data is gathered by word embedding, and lexicogrammatical categorization is based largely on a derived metric of abstraction. This argument is tested by considering probable semantic field relationships for a number of Greek lexemes. Ultimately, this approach provides directions to address some of the critical weaknesses in semantic domain or semantic field theory as applied to the study of Hellenistic Greek, by introducing empirical means of approximating lexical fields. VC 2018 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wishart, R. A. (2018). Hierarchical and distributional lexical field theory: A critical and empirical development of louw and nida’s semantic domain model. International Journal of Lexicography, 31(4), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecy015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free