A Flow Shop Batch Scheduling Model with Pre-Processing and Time-Changing Effects to Minimize Total Actual Flow Time

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Design/methodology/approach: A mathematical model was developed with the decision variables of the number of batches, the number of pre-processings, batch sizes, and the schedule of processes and pre-processings to minimize total actual flow time. Different numbers of batches were gradually tried and increased until the objective function stopped improving. The minimum number of pre-processings that resulted in a feasible solution was examined at each number of batches. Findings: Our experiment showed that: (1) A faster operator learning led to a lower optimal number of batches and a lower total actual flow time, (2) A faster part deterioration brought a higher number of batches and a higher total actual flow time, (3) The model minimized the number of pre-processings by only scheduling pre-processings before the operations at machine 1, and (4) The model divided the parts into small batches to prevent increased processing time due to part deterioration. Research limitations: The research did not consider multi-due date and multi-item system which require pre-processings with different times and capacities. Practical implications: Production managers should assign fast learning operators to shorter batches and faster deteriorating parts. Originality/value: This research was the first to consider pre-processing in batch scheduling. Purpose: This paper investigates a batch scheduling problem where pre-processing is required for parts before processing, considering time-changing effects from part deterioration and operator learning-forgetting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurniawan, D., Yusriski, R., Mi’Radj Isnaini, M., Ma’ruf, A., & Halim, A. H. (2024). A Flow Shop Batch Scheduling Model with Pre-Processing and Time-Changing Effects to Minimize Total Actual Flow Time. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 17(2), 542–561. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.7134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free