Arguing to convince: The rhetoric of scientific discourse

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper deals with scientific discourse as a rhetorical discourse from the point of view of the structure of the classical parts of oral discourse (and all kinds of discourse). The role of argumentation in discourse, with the perlocutionary goal of convincing the receiver, is studied as the foundation of the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse. A scientific treatise by Santiago Ramón y Cajal is analysed using the tools provided by rhetoric in order to prove the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse. The main contribution of this paper is to establish the crucial role of argumentation in scientific discourse and to demonstrate its permeation of the entire discourse.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Albaladejo, T. (2016). Arguing to convince: The rhetoric of scientific discourse. Metode, (6), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.6.4615

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free