Comparison of the effectiveness of balance training using a reaching task between a sitting position and a standing position in the elderly

7Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of balance training using a reaching task between a sitting position and a standing position in the elderly. Subjects and Methods: The study included 30 elderly women from D city. The subjects were divided into the following two groups, according to the training position: the sitting group (n = 15) and standing group (n = 15). Both groups performed training for 20 min, thrice a week for 8 weeks. The short form of the berg balance scale (SFBBS), timed 10-m walk test (10MWT), timed up & go test (TUG), and falls efficacy scale (FES) were used before and after training. Results: SFBBS, 10MWT, and TUG values were significantly different between before and after training in both groups. However, FES values were significantly different in only the standing group. Conclusion: Balance training in a standing position is helpful for improving activities that mainly use the lower extremities, such as gait, and training in a sitting position is somewhat helpful for improving balance ability. In addition, balance training in both positions can help overcome the fear of falling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S. G., Goo, M., & Park, J. H. (2015). Comparison of the effectiveness of balance training using a reaching task between a sitting position and a standing position in the elderly. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 27(7), 2337–2339. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2337

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free