Conversations About Reflexivity

75Citations
Citations of this article
178Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

“Reflexivity” is defined as the regular exercise of the mental ability, shared by all normal people, to consider themselves in relation to their (social) contexts and vice versa. In addition to this sociological interest, it allows us to hold idle or trivial internal conversations. Focussing fully on this phenomenon, this book discusses the three main questions associated with this subject in detail. 1. Where does the ability to be “reflexive” comes from? 2. What part do our internal reflexive deliberations play in designing the courses of action we take: subordinate to habitual action or not? 3. Is “reflexivity” a homogeneous practice for all people and invariant over history? In addressing these questions, contributors engage critically with the most relevant studies by luminaries such as G.H Mead, C.S. Pierce, Habermas, Luhmann, Beck, Giddens and Bourdieu. Most contributors are leading Pragmatists or Critical Realists, associated with the “Reflexivity Forum” an informal, international and inter-disciplinary group. This combination of reference to influential writers of the past, and the best of modern theory has produced a fascinating book that is essential reading for all students with a serious interest in social theory or critical realism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Archer, M. S. (2009). Conversations About Reflexivity. Conversations About Reflexivity (pp. 1–265). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867556

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free