Missing in action: possible effects of water recovery on stream and river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

47Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We use published water balance data from irrigated cropping to show that water entitlements acquired for environmental purposes through water infrastructure subsidies in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia, have resulted in smaller increases in net stream and river flows than is estimated by the Australian Government, and may even have reduced net stream and river flows. Two key policy implications arising from our results are: (1) subsidies to improve irrigation efficiency so as to increase stream and river flows must employ water accounting so that the effects on return flows are known and the volume of water extracted for irrigation is adjusted to achieve desired stream and river flows; and (2) if the net increases in stream and river flows in the MDB are much less than estimated by the Australian Government, water infrastructure subsidies to increase irrigation efficiency may have compromised the delivery of key objects of the Water Act (2007).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, J., & Grafton, R. Q. (2019). Missing in action: possible effects of water recovery on stream and river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Australian Journal of Water Resources, 23(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2019.1579965

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free