Clinical Significance of Coronary Healed Plaques in Stable Angina Pectoris Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Coronary healed plaques (HPs) reportedly have high vulnerability or show advanced atherosclerosis and a risk of rapid plaque progression. However, the prognosis of stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients with HPs undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains under-investigated. Methods and Results: We analyzed 417 consecutive lesions from SAP patients undergoing pre- and post-intervention optical coherence tomography (OCT) for which HPs were defined as having a layered appearance. We investigated the differences in clinical and lesion characteristics, and post-PCI outcomes between HPs and non-HPs. To account for differences in clinical characteristics, propensity score matching was performed between the groups. HPs were observed in 216 lesions (51.8%) in the total cohort. In the propensity-matched cohort (n=294), HPs had higher rates of angiographic-B2/C lesions (77.6% vs. 59.2%, P<0.001), OCT-lipid-rich plaques (40.8% vs. 25.9%, P=0.007), macrophages (78.2% vs. 44.2%, P<0.001), greater luminal area stenosis (73.5±11.0% vs. 71.5±10.3%, P=0.002), and a higher prevalence of post-stenting irregular tissue protrusion (45.1% vs. 14.7%, P<0.001) than non-HPs. In the total cohort, target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free survival was poorer for HPs (log-rank test 7.66; P=0.006), and Cox proportional hazards analysis showed HP as an independent predictor of TLR (hazard ratio, 5.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.72–20.82; P=0.005). Conclusions: In SAP patients, HPs had greater complexity of lesions and higher vulnerability, which may have contributed to the poorer post-PCI outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kimura, S., Isshiki, A., Shimizu, M., Fujii, H., & Suzuki, M. (2023). Clinical Significance of Coronary Healed Plaques in Stable Angina Pectoris Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation Journal, 87(11), 1643–1653. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free