The judicialization of mega-politics and the rise of political courts

355Citations
Citations of this article
254Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years, the judicialization of politics worldwide has expanded its scope to encompass what we may term "mega-politics" - matters of outright and utmost political significance that often define and divide whole polities. In this article, I explore the scope and nature of judicialization of this kind. I begin by identifying the characteristics of the judicialization of mega-politics and by surveying the main explanations for its emergence. I then illustrate the various forms and manifestations of the judicialization of mega-politics through recent examples drawn from jurisprudence of courts and tribunals worldwide. Next, I explore recent studies that advance a strategic "judicialization-from-above" account, which emphasizes support from the political sphere as a necessary precondition for judicialization of pure politics. To further illustrate this point, I survey patterns of political reaction to recurrent manifestations of unsolicited judicial intervention in the political sphere in general, and unwelcome judgments concerning contentious political issues in particular. Copyright © 2008 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hirschl, R. (2008). The judicialization of mega-politics and the rise of political courts. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free