Abstract
In recent years, the judicialization of politics worldwide has expanded its scope to encompass what we may term "mega-politics" - matters of outright and utmost political significance that often define and divide whole polities. In this article, I explore the scope and nature of judicialization of this kind. I begin by identifying the characteristics of the judicialization of mega-politics and by surveying the main explanations for its emergence. I then illustrate the various forms and manifestations of the judicialization of mega-politics through recent examples drawn from jurisprudence of courts and tribunals worldwide. Next, I explore recent studies that advance a strategic "judicialization-from-above" account, which emphasizes support from the political sphere as a necessary precondition for judicialization of pure politics. To further illustrate this point, I survey patterns of political reaction to recurrent manifestations of unsolicited judicial intervention in the political sphere in general, and unwelcome judgments concerning contentious political issues in particular. Copyright © 2008 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hirschl, R. (2008). The judicialization of mega-politics and the rise of political courts. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.