The professional imperative for obstetrician-gynecologists to discontinue newborn male circumcision

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Newborn male circumcision has been practiced for millennia for a variety of medical, social, religious, and cultural reasons. Indications for routine circumcision remain controversial, with proponents and dissidents arguing their sides vigorously. Popular in the United States, it has persisted in the scope of practice of obstetrics and gynecology, a field specializing in the opposite gender. To excel in women's reproductive health, we should no longer passively accept or actively maintain this procedure in our specialty. Steps are suggested to remove the residual and improper inclusion of circumcision from the scope of practice of obstetrics and gynecology. Copyright © 2011 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, J. F. (2011). The professional imperative for obstetrician-gynecologists to discontinue newborn male circumcision. American Journal of Perinatology, 28(2), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1263294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free