An analysis of predictive factors for healing and mortality in patients with enterocutaneous fistulas

60Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Most studies of enterocutaneous fistula report management and outcome. Few studies examine factors predicting healing and mortality. Aim: To identify factors predicting healing and mortality in patients with ECF managed either with a definitive attempt at surgical closure or conservatively. Methods: The case notes of 277 patients with enterocutaneous fistula, treated at our institution over a 10 year period, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into those managed operatively or conservatively. Eleven factors were examined for their relationship to fistula healing and fistula-related mortality. Results: For patients treated operatively, successful enterocutaneous fistula closure related only to the complexity of the fistula (multiple fistula or presence of an internal abscess cavity) (P = 0.03), whereas fistula-related mortality related only to the presence of comorbidity (P = 0.02). In patients managed conservatively, a decreased likelihood of enterocutaneous fistula closure was associated with a high fistula output (P = 0.01), comorbidity (P = 0.03) and being referred from an external institution (P < 0.001). Fistula related-mortality in this group was related to a high output (P = 0.003) and an increased age (P = 0.001). Conclusion: In patients managed operatively, fistula healing and fistula-related mortality are each associated with only one factor, whereas in patients managed conservatively healing and mortality are predicted by three and two factors, respectively. © 2008 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mawdsley, J. E., Hollington, P., Bassett, P., Windsor, A. J., Forbes, A., & Gabe, S. M. (2008). An analysis of predictive factors for healing and mortality in patients with enterocutaneous fistulas. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 28(9), 1111–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03819.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free