Predictors of biochemical failure in patients undergoing prostate whole-gland salvage cryotherapy: A novel risk stratification model

30Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective To assess the prognostic variables predicting the risk of biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) after salvage prostate whole-gland cryotherapy using the Phoenix definition of bPFS. Patients and Methods A total of 132 patients underwent prostate whole-gland salvage cryotherapy with curative intent. No patient underwent neoadjuvant/adjuvant hormonal ablative therapy, and all had extended post-salvage prostate-specific antigen (PSA) follow-up data. Cox univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of potential predictors of bPFS were conducted. Kaplan-Meier analyses of bPFS was also performed. Results At a mean (range) follow-up of 4.3 (0.9-12.7) years, the median (range) post-cryotherapy nadir PSA achieved was 0.17 (0-33.9) ng/mL. On multivariate analysis, predictors of bPFS were nadir PSA post-cryotherapy and pre-salvage biopsy Gleason score (P < 0.001 and 0.009, respectively). Risk stratification groups (low, intermediate and high) were developed based on the presence of zero, one or two adverse risk factors, the risk factors being either a nadir PSA >2.5 ng/mL or biopsy Gleason score ≥7, with the Kaplan-Meier bPFS curves of these risk groups being significantly different (P = 0.02 and <0.001, respectively). Conclusions Post-salvage nadir PSA and pre-salvage biopsy Gleason score are important predictors of outcome in this patient cohort. Low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups can be determined based on these variables and can define patients best suited for prostate cryotherapy. © 2013 BJU International.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spiess, P. E., Levy, D. A., Mouraviev, V., Pisters, L. L., & Jones, J. S. (2013). Predictors of biochemical failure in patients undergoing prostate whole-gland salvage cryotherapy: A novel risk stratification model. BJU International, 112(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11695.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free