RADICAL CYSTECTOMY VERSUS BLADDER-SPARING THERAPY FOR RECURRENT HIGH-GRADE NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER: RESULTS FROM THE COMPARISON OF INTRAVESICAL THERAPY AND SURGERY AS TREATMENT OPTIONS (CISTO) STUDY

  • Gore J
  • Wolff E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gore, J. L., Wolff, E. M., Nash, M. G., Comstock, B. A., Gilbert, S. M., … Smith, A. B. (2025). RADICAL CYSTECTOMY VERSUS BLADDER-SPARING THERAPY FOR RECURRENT HIGH-GRADE NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER: RESULTS FROM THE COMPARISON OF INTRAVESICAL THERAPY AND SURGERY AS TREATMENT OPTIONS (CISTO) STUDY. Journal of Urology, 213(5S2). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0001111604.90306.91.05

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free