New oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists: Benefits for health-related quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation

29Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

New oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have demonstrated their efficacy as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prophylaxis of cardioembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, evidence on the benefits of NOAC in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is lacking. We evaluated changes in HRQoL related to oral anticoagulation therapy employing a specific questionnaire in a cohort of 416 patients with AF undergoing electrical cardioversion. In terms of HRQoL, we observed a progressive adaptation to treatment with VKA; satisfaction with NOAC remained constant. Older age, higher left ventricular ejection fraction and NOAC were associated with better HRQoL. © Ivyspring International Publisher.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alegret, J. M., Viñolas, X., Arias, M. A., Martínez-Rubio, A., Rebollo, P., Ràfols, C., & Martínez-Sande, J. L. (2014). New oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists: Benefits for health-related quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 11(7), 680–684. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.8916

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free