Risk of primary liver cancer associated with gallstones and cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis

31Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Methods: We identified studies by a literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and relevant conference proceedings up to March 2014. A random-effects model was used to generate pooled multivariable adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q statistic and the I2. Background: Recent epidemiological evidence points to an association between gallstones or cholecystectomy and the incidence risk of liver cancer, but the results are inconsistent. We present a meta-analysis of observational studies to explore this association. Copyright: Results: Fifteen studies (five case-control and 10 cohort studies) were included in this analysis. There were 4,487,662 subjects in total, 17,945 diagnoses of liver cancer, 328,420 exposed to gallstones, and 884,507 exposed to cholecystectomy. Pooled results indicated a significant increased risk of liver cancer in patients with a history of gallstones (OR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.71-3.79; n=11 studies), as well as cholecystectomy (OR= 1.62; 95% CI, 1.29-2.02; n= 12 studies), but there was considerable heterogeneity among these studies. The effects estimates did not vary markedly when stratified by gender, study design, study region, and study quality. The multivariate meta-regression analysis suggested that study region and study quality appeared to explain the heterogeneity observed in the cholecystectomy analysis. Conclusions: Our results suggest that individuals with a history of gallstones and cholecystectomy may have an increased risk of liver cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, Y., He, Y., Li, T., Xie, L., Wang, J., Qin, X., & Li, S. (2014). Risk of primary liver cancer associated with gallstones and cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109733

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free