Private Schools and Queue-jumping: A reply to White

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

John White defends the UK private school system from the accusation that it allows an unfair form of ‘queue jumping’ in university admissions. He offers two responses to this accusation, one based on considerations of harm, and one based on meritocratic distribution of university places. We will argue that neither response succeeds: the queue-jumping argument remains a powerful case against the private school system in the UK. We begin by briefly outlining the queue-jumping argument, before evaluating White's no-harm and meritocracy arguments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kidd, I. J., & Jago, M. (2020). Private Schools and Queue-jumping: A reply to White. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(5), 1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12432

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free