Quantifying distance overestimation from global positioning system in urban spaces

22Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives. To investigate accuracy of distance measures computed from Global Positioning System (GPS) points in New York City. Methods. We performed structured walks along urban streets carrying Globalsat DG-100 GPS Data Logger devices in highest and lowest quartiles of building height and tree canopy cover. We used ArcGIS version 10.1 to select walks and compute the straight-line distance (Geographic Information System-measured) and sum of distances between consecutive GPS waypoints (GPS-measured) for each walk. Results. GPS distance overestimates were associated with building height (median overestimate = 97% for high vs 14% for low building height) and to a lesser extent tree canopy (43% for high vs 28% for low tree canopy). Conclusions. Algorithms using distances between successive GPS points to infer speed or travel mode may misclassify trips differentially by context. Researchers studying urban spaces may prefer alternative mode identification techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mooney, S. J., Sheehan, D. M., Zulaika, G., Rundle, A. G., McGill, K., Behrooz, M. R., & Lovasi, G. S. (2016). Quantifying distance overestimation from global positioning system in urban spaces. American Journal of Public Health, 106(4), 651–653. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.303036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free