Abstract
Clinical studies are evaluating possible advantages of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) over bone marrow transplantation (BMT). We compared immune reconstitution after PBSCT (n = 20) and BMT (n = 20) in terms of lymphocyte subset counts and proliferative in vitro responses to mitogens and recall antigens (follow-up: 5 to 11 months posttransplant). Additionally, 10 PBSC harvests and 10 marrow harvests were analyzed for their composition of immunocompetent cells. Compared with BMT patients, PBSCT recipients had PB counts of naive (CD4+CD45RA+) and memory (CD4+CD45R0+) helper T cells and of B calls (CD19+) that were elevated (P < .003, P < .001, and P < .004, respectively) and proliferative responses to phytohemagglutinin (P < .0001), pokeweed mitogen (P < .02), Tetanus toxoid (P < .0005), and Candida (P < .004) that were increased. PBSCT recipients received a mean of 188 (range, 44 to 280) x 108 naive helper T cells and 169 (range, 18 to 296) x 106 memory helper T cells per kilogram; the corresponding numbers for BMT recipients were 11 (range, 4 to 24) and 10 (range, 1 to 22) x 106 cells per kilogram, respectively. The question of whether the documented improved in vitro immune competence after PBSCT is associated with a lower incidence of infectious complications in vivo still needs further study.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ottinger, H. D., Beelen, D. W., Scheulen, B., Schaefer, U. W., & Grosse-Wilde, H. (1996). Improved immune reconstitution after allotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow. Blood, 88(7), 2775–2779. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v88.7.2775.bloodjournal8872775
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.