Ethics in the hollow state: Distinguishing between nonprofit and for-profit agents of prisoner reentry

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

New public management, a reform movement that shifted the provision of public goods and services towards private institutions, is firmly entrenched in the United States. The Hollow State, a metaphor often used synonymously with contracting out, reflects the growing trend of using non-governmental networks-often nonprofits but also for-profit organizations-to deliver social services to vulnerable groups. This article, which draws from the author's dissertation, examines differences in nonprofit and for-profit prisoner reentry agencies. The findings suggest that nonprofit/forprofit differences are eroding as the nonprofit sector becomes more competitive with the private sector for government contracts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beaty, L. (2021). Ethics in the hollow state: Distinguishing between nonprofit and for-profit agents of prisoner reentry. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 7(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.20899/JPNA.7.1.68-88

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free