A Consideration of Literature on Trust and Distrust as they Relate to Auditor Professional Scepticism

13Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With a view to expanding the discussion on professional scepticism, and motivating a broader perspective in research undertaken with the aim of helping auditors meet ongoing demands for an elevated level of professional scepticism, we consider the literature on trust and distrust as it relates to auditor professional scepticism. We draw on literature from a range of disciplines, and highlight new opportunities and previously unidentified challenges in helping auditors exercise an elevated level of professional scepticism. We distinguish between trust and distrust and note that the issue of professional scepticism is likely to be as much about auditors being insufficiently distrusting as it is about auditors being overly trusting. A number of potentially fruitful means by which professional scepticism might be enhanced are highlighted but we also encourage caution in that lower levels of trust in management, and increased distrust in management, may have unintended negative consequences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harding, N., Azim, M. I., Jidin, R., & Muir, J. P. (2016). A Consideration of Literature on Trust and Distrust as they Relate to Auditor Professional Scepticism. Australian Accounting Review, 26(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free