Where Do You Get Your Protein? Or: Biochemical Realization

15Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Biochemical kinds such as proteins pose interesting problems for philosophers of science, as they can be studied from the points of view of both biology and chemistry. The relationship between the biological functions of biochemical kinds and the microstructures that they are related to is the key question. This leads us to a more general discussion about ontological reductionism, microstructuralism, and multiple realization at the biology-chemistry interface. On the face of it, biochemical kinds seem to pose a challenge for ontological reductionism and hence motivate a dual theory of chemical and biological kinds, a type of pluralism about natural kinds. But it will be argued that the challenge, which is based on multiple realization, can be addressed. The upshot is that there are reasonable prospects for ontological reductionism about biochemical kinds, which corroborates natural kind monism. 1Introduction2Functions: Aetiological or Goal-Directed?3Moonlighting and Multiple Determinations4The Powers-Based Subset Strategy5The Case of Haemoglobin6Haemoglobin and the Problem of Lower-Level Vengeance7Multiple Realization and (Higher-Order) Interest Relativeness8The Prospects for Ontological Reductionism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tahko, T. E. (2020). Where Do You Get Your Protein? Or: Biochemical Realization. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(3), 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free