Comparison of sulfate reduction rates in laboratory microcosms, field mesocosms, and in situ at little rock lake, wisconsin

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Model systems examine the effect of several treatments simultaneously, but how well do they simulate natural lake systems? In our studies at Little Rock Lake, Wis., we measured sediment–water fluxes of sulfate in laboratory sediment–water microcosms, in situ limnocorrals, and the whole lake. Treatments in the laboratory sediment–water microcosm experiment included sediment type, temperature, pH, and [SO42–]; sulfate fluxes were determined by mass balance. Treatments in the field mesocosms (4 m diameter × 1.5 m depth, open to sediment) included (in duplicate): control (pH 6.0), pH 5., 5.0, and 4.5 (H2SO4) and pH 5.0 (HCl). Weekly additions of acid maintained treatment pH throughout the summer. Results from these experimental systems are compared with sulfate fluxes measured in the lake (by porewater profiles and a whole-lake budget). Potential problems associated with experimental systems are discussed in the context of these experiments. © 1986 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perry, T. E., Baker, L. A., & Brezonik, P. L. (1986). Comparison of sulfate reduction rates in laboratory microcosms, field mesocosms, and in situ at little rock lake, wisconsin. Lake and Reservoir Management, 2(1), 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/07438148609354648

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free