Stronger Universal and Transferable Attacks by Suppressing Refusals

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Making large language models (LLMs) safe for mass deployment is a complex and ongoing challenge. Efforts have focused on aligning models to human preferences (RLHF), essentially embedding a “safety feature” into the model's parameters. The Greedy Coordinate Gradient (GCG) algorithm (Zou et al., 2023b) emerges as one of the most popular automated jailbreaks, an attack that circumvents this safety training. So far, it is believed that such optimization-based attacks (unlike handcrafted ones) are sample-specific. To make them universal and transferable, one has to incorporate multiple samples and models into the objective function. Contrary to this belief, we find that the adversarial prompts discovered by such optimizers are inherently prompt-universal and transferable, even when optimized on a single model and a single harmful request. To further exploit this phenomenon, we introduce IRIS, a new objective to these optimizers to explicitly deactivate the safety feature to create an even stronger universal and transferable attack. Without requiring a large number of queries or accessing output token probabilities, our universal and transferable attack achieves a 25% success rate against the state-of-the-art Circuit Breaker defense (Zou et al., 2024), compared to 2.5% by white-box GCG. Crucially, IRIS also attains state-of-the-art transfer rates on frontier models: GPT-3.5Turbo (90%), GPT-4o-mini (86%), GPT-4o (76%), o1-mini (54%), o1-preview (48%), o3-mini (66%), and deepseek-reasoner (90%).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, D., Shah, A., Araujo, A., Wagner, D., & Sitawarin, C. (2025). Stronger Universal and Transferable Attacks by Suppressing Refusals. In Proceedings of the 2025 Annual Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Long Papers, NAACL-HLT 2025 (Vol. 1, pp. 5850–5876). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free