A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist statistics as applied in a simple repeated measures example

Abstract

Clinicians see Bayesian and frequentist analysis in published research papers, and need a basic understanding of both. A repeated measures data set was analyzed using both approaches. Assumptions underlying each method and conclusions reached were contrasted. The Bayesian approach is a viable alternative to frequentist statistical analysis for many clinical projects. Copyright © 2004 JMASM, Inc.