Ratios of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Pseudomonas fluorescens as a model for bacterial element ratios and nutrient regeneration

69Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Bacteria play a significant role in the nutrient dynamics of planktonic systems, yet their nutrient demands are poorly known. Here, we characterize the element ratios of a common freshwater bacterium relative to growth rate and nutrient availability. Pseudomonas fluorescens was grown in chemostats at dilution rates of 0.03, 0.06, and 0.09 h-1. Phosphorus (P) was supplied at approximately 5 μM and nitrogen (N) was supplied at varying concentrations to establish resource molar-N·P ratios (SN P) ranging between 5.1 and 117:1. Carbon was supplied in excess. Chemostats were sampled at steady state, the element composition of cells (Q) was determined, and element ratios (QX Y) were calculated. QC N was 7.6.1 and varied little with respect to growth rate or the element composition of the medium. In contrast, QN P was variable and positively related to the SN,P until an upper limit of ∼21:1 was attained at a SN P of 33:1. QC P mimicked QN P and was constrained by the fixed QC N. P. fluorescens appeared to have a high capacity to accumulate P and the data suggested that the organism may be capable of incorporating P above that required to meet metabolic demand ('luxury uptake'). Comparison of these data with previously published data revealed that the bacteria have a much greater potential to adjust their QN P when the N:P ratio of resources supporting growth is low (N scarce), than when the ratio is high (N abundant). The C:N:P ratio of bacteria was found to vary between 52:8:1 when N was scarce relative to P (N:P < 40:1), to as high as 163:25:1 when N was abundant relative to P (N:P > 40:1).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chrzanowski, T. H., & Kyle, M. (1996). Ratios of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Pseudomonas fluorescens as a model for bacterial element ratios and nutrient regeneration. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 10(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame010115

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free