Comments on “Field Calibration of Water Content Reflectometers”

  • Nadler A
3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Field monitoring of volumetric soil water content (VWC) is critical for a variety of applications. Recently developed electronic soil water sensors provide a relatively inexpensive monitoring option. However, the calibration of these sensors is more sensitive to variations in soil properties than for time domain reflectometry (TDR), which is generally regarded as the best electronic means of VWC measurement and which has a relatively robust calibration. Field calibration incorporates the effects of within-profile and between-site soil variations and individual variability on sensor response. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using TDR to field-calibrate the Campbell Scientific water content reflectometer (WCR), or CS-615, which is an example of a newly developed sensor in widespread use. We found that (i) there was a strong, linear correlation between the WCR-measured period and TDR-measured VWC; (ii) the WCR calibration varied with soil type; ! (iii) calibration of individual sensors resulted in excellent agreement between TDR and the WCR measurements; and (iv) calibration resulted in improved description of soil water dynamics and improved precision of VWC estimates. Addresses: Utah State Univ, Dept Plants Soils & Biometeorol, Logan, UT 84322 USA; USDA ARS, Boise, ID 83712 USA; Boise State Univ, Dept Geosci, Boise, ID 83723 USA

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nadler, A. (2005). Comments on “Field Calibration of Water Content Reflectometers.” Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69(4), 1356–1357. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0085le

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free