Hydrocortisone concentration influences time to clinically significant healing of acute inflammation of the ocular surface and adnexa - Results from a double-blind randomized controlled trial

2Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of topical ophthalmic corticosteroids depends upon small modifications in preparations, such as drug concentration.The aim of this study was to confirm that hydrocortisone acetate (HC-ac) ophthalmic ointments of 2.5% and 1% are more effective than a 0.5% eye ointment. Methods. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study, the change of signs and symptoms of acute inflammation of the ocular surface and adnexa was evaluated in 411 subjects. Results: Median time to clinically relevant response as estimated by 50% reduction in clinical signs and symptoms (CSS) total score over the entire trial was similar for subjects treated with HC-ac 2.5% (73.5 h) and for subjects treated with HC-ac 1.0% (67.7 h) and was considerably and significantly longer for subjects treated with HC-ac 0.5% (111.8 h) [p < 0.001 for both dosages]. All trial medications were safe and well tolerated. Conclusion: Hydrocortisone acetate 2.5% and Hydrocortisone acetate 1% eye ointments are efficacious and safe treatments for acute inflammations of the ocular surface or adnexa, and showed significantly better efficacy than a control group treated with Hydrocortisone acetate 0.5% therapy. Trial registration. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15464650. © 2014 Sergiyenko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sergiyenko, N., Sukhina, L., Bezdetko, P., Kovalenko, Y., Nikitin, N., Merzbacher, M., … Kohnen, R. (2014). Hydrocortisone concentration influences time to clinically significant healing of acute inflammation of the ocular surface and adnexa - Results from a double-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Ophthalmology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-64

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free