Wearables and sur(Over)-veillance, sous(under)-veillance, co(so)-veillance, and metaveillance (veillance of veillance) for health and well-being

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

At the University of Toronto, we’re embarking on a bold new initiative to bring together these four disciplines: law, business, engineering, and medicine, through what we call “sousveillant systems”—grassroots systems of “bottom up” facilitation of cross-, trans-, inter-, meta-, and anti-disciplinarity, or, more importantly, cross-, trans-, and inter-passionary efforts. Passion is a better master than discipline (to paraphrase Albert Einstein’s “Love is a better master than duty”). Our aim is not to eliminate “big science,” “big data,” and “big watching” (surveillance), but to complement these things with a balancing force. There will still be “ladder climbers,” but we aim to balance these entities and individuals with those who embody the “integrity of authenticity” and to provide a complete picture that is otherwise a half-truth when only the “big” end is present. This generalizes the notion of “open source,” where each instance of a system (e.g., computer operating system) contains or can contain its own seeds (e.g., source code). Sousveillant systems are an alternative to the otherwise sterile world of closed-source, specialist silos that are not auditable by end-users (i.e., are only auditable by authorities from “above”).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mann, S. (2020). Wearables and sur(Over)-veillance, sous(under)-veillance, co(so)-veillance, and metaveillance (veillance of veillance) for health and well-being. Surveillance and Society, 18(2), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i2.13937

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free