Alternative sources of pluripotent stem cells: Ethical and scientific issues revisited

29Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Stem cell researchers in the United States continue to face an uncertain future, because of the changing federal guidelines governing this research, the restrictive patent situation surrounding the generation of new human embryonic stem cell lines, and the ethical divide over the use of embryos for research. In this commentary, we describe how recent advances in the derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells and the isolation of germ-line-derived pluripotent stem cells resolve a number of these uncertainties. The availability of patient-matched, pluripotent stem cells that can be obtained by ethically acceptable means provides important advantages for stem cell researchers, by both avoiding protracted ethical debates and giving U.S. researchers full access to federal funding. Thus, ethically uncompromised stem cells, such as those derived by direct reprogramming or from germ-cell precursors, are likely to yield important advances in stem cell research and move the field rapidly toward clinical applications. © Copyright 2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Condic, M. L., & Rao, M. (2010, August 1). Alternative sources of pluripotent stem cells: Ethical and scientific issues revisited. Stem Cells and Development. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2009.0482

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free