The EUCAST rapid disc diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood culture bottles

145Citations
Citations of this article
190Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: With increasing antimicrobial resistance, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) becomes important, especially in patients with bloodstream infections. EUCAST decided to develop a standardized rapid method, based on EUCAST disc diffusion, to offer susceptibility reports within 4-8 h of a positive blood culture (BC). Methods: BC bottles were spiked with clinical isolates (n = 332) of the seven most relevant sepsis pathogens with a variety of resistance mechanisms. RAST was performed directly from the bottle and zones read after 4, 6 and 8 h. Several variables were investigated, including the effect of using different BC bottles and of a 0-18 h delay between a positive signal and the performance of RAST. Results: For five species, most inhibition zones could be read after 4 h. The proportion of results that could be interpreted increased from 75% at 4 h to 84% after 8 h. Categorical agreement against the reference method was good, with error rates of false susceptibility of 0.2%, 0.2% and 0.2% at 4, 6 and 8 h and false resistance of 1.2%, 0.2% and 0.1% at 4, 6 and 8 h, respectively. Conclusions: With the EUCAST RAST method, reliable AST results can be delivered within 4-8 h of positivity of BC bottles for seven important bloodstream infection pathogens. To reduce the occurrence of errors and to absorb the variability caused by using a non-standardized inoculum, material from different manufacturers and workflow-related delays, we have introduced an area in which interpretation is not permitted, the Area of Technical Uncertainty.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jonasson, E., Matuschek, E., & Kahlmeter, G. (2020). The EUCAST rapid disc diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood culture bottles. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 75(4), 968–978. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz548

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free