Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention compared with medical therapy for ischemic heart disease in Japan

16Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ischemic heart disease is undetermined in Japan. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of PCI compared with medical therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and angina pectoris (AP) in Japan. Methods and Results: We used Markov models for STEMI and AP to assess the costs and benefits associated with PCI or medical therapy from a health system perspective. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and ICER

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kodera, S., Morita, H., Kiyosue, A., Ando, J., & Komuro, I. (2019). Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention compared with medical therapy for ischemic heart disease in Japan. Circulation Journal, 83(7), 1498–1505. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0148

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free