Abstract
Background: The cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ischemic heart disease is undetermined in Japan. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of PCI compared with medical therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and angina pectoris (AP) in Japan. Methods and Results: We used Markov models for STEMI and AP to assess the costs and benefits associated with PCI or medical therapy from a health system perspective. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and ICER
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kodera, S., Morita, H., Kiyosue, A., Ando, J., & Komuro, I. (2019). Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention compared with medical therapy for ischemic heart disease in Japan. Circulation Journal, 83(7), 1498–1505. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0148
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.