A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent work on reliability coefficients has largely focused on continuous items, including critiques of Cronbach’s alpha. Although two new model-based reliability coefficients have been proposed for dichotomous items (Dimitrov, 2003a,b; Green & Yang, 2009a), these approaches have yet to be compared to each other or other popular estimates of reliability such as omega, alpha, and the greatest lower bound. We seek computational improvements to one of these model-based reliability coefficients and, in addition, conduct initial Monte Carlo simulations to compare coefficients using dichotomous data. Our results suggest that such improvements to the model-based approach are warranted, while model-based approaches were generally superior.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Béland, S., & Falk, C. F. (2022). A Comparison of Modern and Popular Approaches to Calculating Reliability for Dichotomously Scored Items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 46(4), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216221084210

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free