The Court of Justice in times of politicisation: ‘law as a mask and shield’ revisited

  • Blauberger M
  • Martinsen D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This contribution analyses if and under what conditions bottom-up pressures constrain the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Neofunctionalists famously explained the power of the Court by its use of 'law as a mask and shield'. Due to its technical nature, the Court is able to mask the political substance of 'integration through law' and to shield it from political challenges. We revisit this argument in times of politicisation of the EU and develop a typology of four constellations depending on different kinds of bottom-up pressures. We argue that depoliticised integration through law still functions, to varying degrees, in face of either governmental contestation or public politicisation. By contrast, if member state governments and the public jointly oppose further integration through law, the Court is constrained as further expansive jurisprudence could even reinforce politicisation and risk political backlash. We illustrate our argument with case law on EU citizenship.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blauberger, M., & Martinsen, D. S. (2020). The Court of Justice in times of politicisation: ‘law as a mask and shield’ revisited. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712460

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free