Shear bond strength of two calcium silicate-based cements to compomer

5Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The purposes of this in vitro study was to compare the bond strength of Biodentine® and Imicryl MTA to a compomer material, and to examine the effect of the setting time on the bond strength. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 acrylic blocks with a hole (4 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height) were prepared. Acrylic blocks were randomly divided into two main groups according to cement type to be applied, Biodontine® or Imicryl MTA (n = 50). The specimens of each main group were then divided into 5 subgroups, which were randomized relative to different setting times. (12 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 96 hours) (n = 10). The samples were filled completely with Biodentine® or Imicrly MTA according to the manufacturer's instructions. Compomer was placed in this transparent tube with the help of a hand plugger and light cured for 40 seconds with the LED device (Elipar™, 3M ESPE, MN, USA) to polymerize the compomer. The acrylic molds were fixed to a universal test machine and shear bond strength (SBS) test was made under shear force at a cross-speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (p=0.05). Results: While, Biodentine® had significantly higher SBS values than Imicrly MTA at 12m setting time (p < 0.05), there was no difference between Biodentine® and Imicrly MTA among other setting periods (p > 0.05). Regardless of cements tested, there were similar SBS values among pairwise comparisons between setting time groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: There were higher SBS values of Biodentine® to compomer than Imicrly MTA in all setting time groups, the only statistical significance existed in 12 min group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buldur, B., Oznurhan, F., Kayabasi, M., & Sahin, F. (2018). Shear bond strength of two calcium silicate-based cements to compomer. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 21(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.381422

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free