Assigning evidence to actionability: An introduction to variant interpretation in precision cancer medicine

18Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Modern concepts in precision cancer medicine are based on increasingly complex genomic analyses and require standardized criteria for the functional evaluation and reporting of detected genomic alterations in order to assess their clinical relevance. In this article, we propose and address the necessary steps in systematic variant evaluation consisting of bioinformatic analysis, functional annotation and clinical interpretation, focusing on the latter two aspects. We discuss the role and clinical application of current variant classification systems and point out their scope and limitations. Finally, we highlight the significance of the molecular tumor board as a platform for clinical decision-making based on genomic analyses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horak, P., Leichsenring, J., Goldschmid, H., Kreutzfeldt, S., Kazdal, D., Teleanu, V., … Stenzinger, A. (2022, June 1). Assigning evidence to actionability: An introduction to variant interpretation in precision cancer medicine. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.22987

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free