Informal Segregation in Health Care Delivery: Historical, Anecdotal, and Objective Evidence

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Over the past several decades, our nation has made limited progress toward achieving health equity. One challenge is that health care delivery remains highly segregated by race and ethnicity. Although formal racial segregation officially ended in the 1960s, informal segregation remains widely practiced, accepted, and even justified. I provide historical, anecdotal, and objective data to demonstrate its persistence. I discuss my 40-year journey in segregated health care systems and a brief review of key studies and research on such segregation. I also highlight how despite the ample evidence, pervasive segregation in health care delivery remains an uncomfortable topic that few want to broach or discuss. I note that greater recognition, visibility, and advocacy are needed to address this unfair, unjust, and pervasive practice. I conclude that in the current political climate, being trustworthy and engaging communities in a meaningful way to eliminate disparities means we cannot remain complacent and silent on some of the most deeply rooted challenges to achieving health equity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carrasquillo, O. (2025). Informal Segregation in Health Care Delivery: Historical, Anecdotal, and Objective Evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 115, S148–S151. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free